Clarence Dukes v. Richard Wilson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Clarence Dukes v. Richard Wilson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6910

CLARENCE DUKES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RICHARD WILSON, Business Manager,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:11-cv-00530-NKM-RSB)

Submitted: October 28, 2013 Decided: November 5, 2013

Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Dukes, Appellant Pro Se. Lara Kate Jacobs Todd, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clarence Dukes appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Dukes v. Wilson, No. 7:11-cv-00530-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va.

August 28, 2012; May 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished