Perpetua Ezeh v. Bio-Medical Applications of MD

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Perpetua Ezeh v. Bio-Medical Applications of MD

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1713

PERPETUA U. EZEH,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

BIO-MEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF MARYLAND, INC., d/b/a Fresenius Medical Care of Porter Dialysis-Rosedale,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE; FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE KAMI PARTNERS, LLC, d/b/a Porter Dialysis,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:11-cv-03441-GLR)

Submitted: October 30, 2013 Decided: November 6, 2013

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Perpetua U. Ezeh, Appellant Pro Se. Ariana Wright Arnold, Jennifer Lynn Curry, JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Perpetua U. Ezeh appeals the district court’s order

granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this

employment discrimination case arising from Ezeh’s employment

with Bio-Medical Applications of Maryland. We have carefully

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its

thorough opinion. Ezeh v. Bio-Medical Applications of Md., No.

1:11-cv-03441-GLR (D. Md. May 1, 2013). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished