Perpetua Ezeh v. Bio-Medical Applications of MD
Perpetua Ezeh v. Bio-Medical Applications of MD
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1713
PERPETUA U. EZEH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BIO-MEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF MARYLAND, INC., d/b/a Fresenius Medical Care of Porter Dialysis-Rosedale,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE; FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE KAMI PARTNERS, LLC, d/b/a Porter Dialysis,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:11-cv-03441-GLR)
Submitted: October 30, 2013 Decided: November 6, 2013
Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Perpetua U. Ezeh, Appellant Pro Se. Ariana Wright Arnold, Jennifer Lynn Curry, JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Perpetua U. Ezeh appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this
employment discrimination case arising from Ezeh’s employment
with Bio-Medical Applications of Maryland. We have carefully
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its
thorough opinion. Ezeh v. Bio-Medical Applications of Md., No.
1:11-cv-03441-GLR (D. Md. May 1, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished