United States v. Frederick Smalls

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Frederick Smalls

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6640

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

FREDERICK SMALLS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (2:09-cr-00802-PMD-1)

Submitted: October 30, 2013 Decided: November 8, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Smalls, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Nicholas Bianchi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Frederick Smalls appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion under

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) for

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Smalls, No. 2:09-cr-

00802-PMD-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 3, 2013). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished