U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Frederick Smith

United States v. Frederick Smith
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 12, 2013

United States v. Frederick Smith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6746

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. FREDERICK J. SMITH, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cr-00032-REP-1)

Submitted: October 31, 2013 Decided: November 12, 2013

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick J. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Arlen Jagels, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Frederick J. Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to correct his trial transcript under Fed. R. App. P.10(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 3:08-cr-00032-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 8, 2013). We deny Smith’s motion for transcripts at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.