U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Frederick Burgess

United States v. Frederick Burgess
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 12, 2013

United States v. Frederick Burgess

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7046

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. FREDERICK FRISALYN BURGESS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (4:07-cr-00481-TLW-8)

Submitted: October 28, 2013 Decided: November 12, 2013

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Frisalyn Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Frederick Frisalyn Burgess appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burgess, No. 4:07-cr-00481-TLW-8 (D.S.C. June 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.