In Re: Eddie Gamble, Sr. v.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

In Re: Eddie Gamble, Sr. v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1628

In Re: EDDIE GAMBLE, SR.,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:11-ct-03176-FL)

Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: November 21, 2013

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Gamble, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eddie Gamble, Sr., filed a petition for a writ of

mandamus and a supplemental petition for a writ of mandamus,

alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on

his Bivens * action. He seeks an order from this court directing

the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s

docket reveals that the district court has dismissed the action

without prejudice and denied Gamble’s motions for

reconsideration. Accordingly, because Gamble has obtained the

relief he requested, we deny the mandamus petition and

supplemental mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished