Jimmy Jones v. Gary Lane

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Jimmy Jones v. Gary Lane

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7243

JIMMY DEAN JONES, a/k/a Jimmy D. Jones,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GARY LANE; CORPORAL BETTY RODGERS; LIEUTENANT LAWRENCE LEVIGNE; INVESTIGATOR DONALD LANE,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

TIM RILEY, Warden; TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, et al.; LAURA CALDWELL; MRS. NANCY BYRD; DISCIPLINARY HEARING OFFICER R.L. TURNER,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (1:12-cv-01033-JMC)

Submitted: November 19, 2013 Decided: November 22, 2013

Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmy D. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Holmes Burton, GIBBES & BURTON, LLC, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Dean Jones appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing without prejudice Jones’

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006)

complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Jones v. Lane, No. 1:12-cv-01033-JMC (D.S.C. June 26,

2013). We grant Jones’ motion to file a supplemental informal

reply brief and deny his motion for appointment of counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished