United States v. Harold Fields

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Harold Fields

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7080

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

HAROLD FIELDS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (2:89-cr-00251-JAB-1)

Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: November 25, 2013

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Harold Fields appeals the district court’s order

denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence

reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. ∗ United States v. Fields, No. 2:89-cr-00251-JAB-

1 (M.D.N.C. July 2, 2013). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ We further note that

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) is not the appropriate mechanism to assert the retroactive application of Alleyne v. United States,

133 S. Ct. 2151

(2013).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished