U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Harold Fields

United States v. Harold Fields
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 25, 2013

United States v. Harold Fields

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7080

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HAROLD FIELDS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (2:89-cr-00251-JAB-1)

Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: November 25, 2013

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Harold Fields appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. ∗ United States v. Fields, No. 2:89-cr-00251-JAB- (M.D.N.C. July 2, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ We further note that 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is not the appropriate mechanism to assert the retroactive application of Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.