U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Ronald Emrit v. Office Depot, Inc.

Ronald Emrit v. Office Depot, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 25, 2013

Ronald Emrit v. Office Depot, Inc.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2141

RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:13-cv-02297-RWT)

Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: November 25, 2013

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Ronald Satish Emrit seeks to appeal the district court order requiring Emrit to particularize his employment discrimination complaint by providing a copy of a right to sue letter. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545- (1949). The order Emrit seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.