United States v. Anthony Snipe
United States v. Anthony Snipe
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7448
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ANTHONY LAMAR SNIPE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (2:02-cr-00833-PMD-1)
Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: November 26, 2013
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Lamar Snipe, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Anthony Lamar Snipe appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reconsider the court’s previous denial of
his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence
reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. See United States v. Goodwyn,
596 F.3d 233, 235-36(4th
Cir. 2010) (district court does not have authority to reconsider
prior order on § 3582 motion). Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished