United States v. Adrian Benniefield

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Adrian Benniefield

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7481

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ADRIAN LAMONT BENNIEFIELD, a/k/a Adrian Benniefield,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:09-cr-00055-HEH-1)

Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: November 26, 2013

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adrian Lamont Benniefield, Appellant Pro Se. Roderick Charles Young, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Adrian Lamont Benniefield appeals the district court’s

order denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2012) motion for

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Benniefield,

No. 3:09-cr-00055-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 2013). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished