U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Haywood Chavis, Jr.

United States v. Haywood Chavis, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 6, 2013

United States v. Haywood Chavis, Jr.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7171

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HAYWOOD LEE CHAVIS, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (4:04-cr-00087-WDK-JEB-2)

Submitted: November 8, 2013 Decided: December 6, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Haywood Lee Chavis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Rae McKeel, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Haywood Lee Chavis, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Chavis, No. 4:04-cr-00087-WDK-JEB-2 (E.D. Va. filed June 25, 2013; entered June 26, 2013). We deny Chavis’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.