James Wilkes v. Dr. Inerio Alarcon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

James Wilkes v. Dr. Inerio Alarcon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6967

JAMES D. WILKES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DR. INERIO ALARCON; UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00131-IMK-JSK)

Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: December 9, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James D. Wilkes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James D. Wilkes appeals the district court’s order

adopting as modified the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) his complaint

filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.

Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Wilkes v.

Alarcon, No. 1:11-cv-00131-IMK-JSK (N.D. W. Va. May 21, 2013).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished