Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Esperanza Guerrero appeals the district court’s June 20, 2013 order denying multiple post-judgment motions and its July 17, 2013 order denying her subsequent motion for reconsideration. * On review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying Guerrero’s untimely motion for judgment as a matter of law, Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b) (“A court may not extend the time to act under Rule 50(b)-”). Further, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief pursuant to either Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) or Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). See Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp., 599 F.3d 403, 407 (4th Cir. 2010) (standard of review for Rule 59(e)); MLC Auto., 532 F.3d at 277 (standard of review for Rule 60(b)). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the orders in question. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.