United States v. Pam Lydia

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Pam Lydia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7287

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PAM LYDIA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:05-cr-01080-GRA-4)

Submitted: December 17, 2013 Decided: December 20, 2013

Before KING, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pam Lydia, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Pam Lydia appeals the district court’s order denying

her

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence

reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Lydia, No. 7:05-cr-01080-GRA-4

(D.S.C. July 26,2013). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished