UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7307

OPHELIA AZRIEL DE’LONTA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SARAH PRUITT, Correctional Officer,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

HAROLD CLARKE, Director, VADOC; G. K. WASHINGTON, Regional Admin; LARRY EDMONDS, Warden, BKCC; C. DAVIS, Major, Chief of Security; DAVIS, Institutional Investigator; AGENT WATSON, Internal Affairs Unit; LISA LANG, Staff Psychologist; ATTORNEY GENERAL KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI; DON LEMOND, Director,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:11-cv-00483-JCT-RSB)

Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 23, 2013

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ophelia Azriel De’Lonta, Appellant Pro Se. Antonio Pierre Jackson, LAW OFFICE OF A. PIERRE JACKSON, P.C., Hampden-Sydney, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Ophelia Azriel De’Lonta appeals the jury verdict in

favor of Defendant Sarah Pruitt and the district court’s prior

order granting the other Defendants’ motion for summary judgment

in De’Lonta’s

(2006) action. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. * De’Lonta v.

Pruitt, No. 7:11-cv-00483-JCT-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 11, 2012; July

18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

* We note that the only issue De’Lonta raises with respect to the jury trial is Pruitt’s failure to timely respond to De’Lonta’s revised motion to compel production of documents. We find no reversible error in this regard.

3