Joseph Sun v. Eric Erickson
Joseph Sun v. Eric Erickson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1836
JOSEPH C. SUN,
Creditor - Appellant,
v.
ERIC JONATHAN ERICKSON,
Debtor – Appellee,
KEVIN CAMPBELL,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:12-cv-03582-RMG)
Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 23, 2013
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph C. Sun, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Jonathan Erickson, SEA ISLAND CRIMINAL LAW, Beaufort, South Carolina; Kevin Campbell, CAMPBELL LAW FIRM, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, Appellees Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Joseph C. Sun appeals from the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders denying Sun’s motion to
reopen Eric Erickson’s bankruptcy case, striking Sun’s attempt
to initiate an adversary proceeding, and denying his motion to
reconsider those orders. We have reviewed the record and find
no abuse of discretion by the bankruptcy court. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the lower courts. Sun v.
Erickson, No. 2:12-cv-03582-RMG (D.S.C. June 17, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished