Joseph Sun v. Eric Erickson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Joseph Sun v. Eric Erickson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1836

JOSEPH C. SUN,

Creditor - Appellant,

v.

ERIC JONATHAN ERICKSON,

Debtor – Appellee,

KEVIN CAMPBELL,

Trustee - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:12-cv-03582-RMG)

Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 23, 2013

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph C. Sun, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Jonathan Erickson, SEA ISLAND CRIMINAL LAW, Beaufort, South Carolina; Kevin Campbell, CAMPBELL LAW FIRM, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, Appellees Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joseph C. Sun appeals from the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders denying Sun’s motion to

reopen Eric Erickson’s bankruptcy case, striking Sun’s attempt

to initiate an adversary proceeding, and denying his motion to

reconsider those orders. We have reviewed the record and find

no abuse of discretion by the bankruptcy court. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the lower courts. Sun v.

Erickson, No. 2:12-cv-03582-RMG (D.S.C. June 17, 2013). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished