U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Ali Swinton v. Bettye Gum

Ali Swinton v. Bettye Gum
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 23, 2013

Ali Swinton v. Bettye Gum

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1892

ALI SWINTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MS. BETTYE GUM; MS. DESIREE ALLEN, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:12-cv-01587-CMC)

Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 23, 2013

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ali Swinton, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Barnwell McMaster, TOMPKINS & MCMASTER, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Ali Swinton appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Swinton v. Gum, No. 3:12-cv-01587-CMC (D.S.C. June 21, 2013).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.