United States v. Steven Carr

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Steven Carr

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7425

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STEVEN DONEWAN CARR, a/k/a Steven D. Carr,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:98-cr-00246-RLV-2)

Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Donewan Carr, Appellant Pro Se. William A. Brafford, Douglas Scott Broyles, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Steven Donewan Carr appeals the district court’s order

deny his motions for the return of property. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Carr, No. 5:98-cr-00246-RLV-2 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 26, 2013). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished