United States v. Paul Davis

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Paul Davis

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7623

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PAUL CHRISTOPHER DAVIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (2:94-cr-00239-JAB-1)

Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Christopher Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Paul Christopher Davis appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion for a sentence reduction,

filed pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c) (2012). We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Davis, No. 2:94-cr-00239-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2013). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished