Korell Battle v. John Ozmint
Korell Battle v. John Ozmint
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7436
KORELL BATTLE, a/k/a Korell Robert Floyd Battle, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN OZMINT; FREDRICK THOMPSON; D. BAILEY; MCKITHER BODISON; DARRYL KING; GILMORE; JOHN DOE, Officer, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (2:12-cv-01350-CMC)
Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Korell Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Nikole D. Haltiwanger, Roy F.
Laney, Damon C. Wlodarczyk, RILEY, POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Korell Battle appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Battle v. Ozmint, No. 2:12-cv-01350-CMC (D.S.C. Aug. 27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.