Anthony Brooks v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Anthony Brooks v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7522

ANTHONY EUGENE BROOKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:10-cv-01340)

Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Eugene Brooks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anthony Eugene Brooks appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort

Claims Act,

28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346

(b)(1), 2671-2680 (West 2006 &

Supp. 2013), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.

Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. United

States, No. 5:10-cv-01340 (S.D.W. Va. July 31, 2013). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished