U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Anthony Brooks v. United States

Anthony Brooks v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 24, 2013

Anthony Brooks v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7522

ANTHONY EUGENE BROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:10-cv-01340)

Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Eugene Brooks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Anthony Eugene Brooks appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680 (West 2006 & Supp. 2013), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. United States, No. 5:10-cv-01340 (S.D.W. Va. July 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.