U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Johnny Gore

United States v. Johnny Gore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 2, 2013 · Davis, Hamilton, Motz, Per Curiam
502 F. App'x 331

United States v. Johnny Gore

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Lee Gore seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for bail pending a final disposition on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gore has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Gore’s motion to expedite the decision as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.