Bartola Pacetti v. Michael Astrue
Bartola Pacetti v. Michael Astrue
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2057
BARTOLA J. PACETTI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration; MARY HOLT,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
MARK S. MILLARD, Judge; ALAN CARLSON; STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL; KATHY RICCI,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01293-LO-TCB)
Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: January 2, 2013
Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bartola J. Pacetti, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Ann Edelstein, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Bartola J. Pacetti appeals the district court’s orders
granting Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismissing his civil
action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Pacetti v. Millard, No. 1:11-cv-01293-LO-TCB (E.D.
Va. Mar. 27, 2012 & filed Aug. 22, 2012, entered Aug. 23, 2012).
We deny Pacetti’s motion for a transcript at government expense.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished