U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Bartola Pacetti v. Michael Astrue

Bartola Pacetti v. Michael Astrue
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 2, 2013

Bartola Pacetti v. Michael Astrue

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2057

BARTOLA J. PACETTI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration; MARY HOLT, Defendants – Appellees, and MARK S. MILLARD, Judge; ALAN CARLSON; STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL; KATHY RICCI, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01293-LO-TCB)

Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: January 2, 2013

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bartola J. Pacetti, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Ann Edelstein, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Bartola J. Pacetti appeals the district court’s orders granting Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pacetti v. Millard, No. 1:11-cv-01293-LO-TCB (E.D.

Va. Mar. 27, 2012 & filed Aug. 22, 2012, entered Aug. 23, 2012).

We deny Pacetti’s motion for a transcript at government expense.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.