Gregory Marshall v. James Tichnell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Gregory Marshall v. James Tichnell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7076

GREGORY MARSHALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MR. JAMES TICHNELL, Case Management Manager WCI; PETERS, Detective, Sergeant, Crimes Unit Investigator, Internal Investigation Unit,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:12-cv-01518-RWT)

Submitted: October 30, 2012 Decided: January 16, 2013

Before KING, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Marshall, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gregory Marshall appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(g) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.

Marshall v. Tichnell, No. 8:12-cv-01518-RWT (D. Md. May 31,

2012). We deny the motions for appointment of counsel, to

proceed under the Prison Litigation Reform Act without

prepayment of fees, for leave to file lengthy brief, and for

emergency declaration for entry of default judgment. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished