Reginald Lee v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Reginald Lee v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2257

REGINALD L. LEE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE; JAY A. DACKMAN, P.A.; ANTHONY J. DELAURENTIS, P.A.; WILLIAM M. O'CONNELL, P.A.; JOHN K. REIFF, P.A.; JACK E. REID; DELAURENTIS, REIFF & REID, LLC; RON SROKA, P.A.; BENJAMIN ZAJDEL; STANLEY ALPERT, P.A.; HEIDI S. KENNY, P.A.; KAREN M. AUTHEMENT, P.A.; MARY F. KEENAN, Assistant Solicitor; KYRIAKOS MARUDAS, Assistant Solicitor; A.J. BILLIG AUCTIONEERS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:12-cv-02418-JKB)

Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Lee, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Reginald L. Lee appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant

to the Rooker-Feldman ∗ doctrine. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. Mayor & City

Council of Balt., No. 1:12-cv-02418-JKB (D. Md. filed Sept. 14,

2012; entered Sept. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman,

460 U.S. 462

(1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co.,

263 U.S. 413

(1923).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished