U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Reginald Lee v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

Reginald Lee v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 22, 2013

Reginald Lee v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2257

REGINALD L. LEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE; JAY A. DACKMAN, P.A.; ANTHONY J. DELAURENTIS, P.A.; WILLIAM M. O'CONNELL, P.A.; JOHN K. REIFF, P.A.; JACK E. REID; DELAURENTIS, REIFF & REID, LLC; RON SROKA, P.A.; BENJAMIN ZAJDEL; STANLEY ALPERT, P.A.; HEIDI S. KENNY, P.A.; KAREN M. AUTHEMENT, P.A.; MARY F. KEENAN, Assistant Solicitor; KYRIAKOS MARUDAS, Assistant Solicitor; A.J. BILLIG AUCTIONEERS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:12-cv-02418-JKB)

Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Lee, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Reginald L. Lee appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman ∗ doctrine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. Mayor & City Council of Balt., No. 1:12-cv-02418-JKB (D. Md. filed Sept. 14, 2012; entered Sept. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.