Reginald Lee v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Reginald Lee v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2257
REGINALD L. LEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE; JAY A. DACKMAN, P.A.; ANTHONY J. DELAURENTIS, P.A.; WILLIAM M. O'CONNELL, P.A.; JOHN K. REIFF, P.A.; JACK E. REID; DELAURENTIS, REIFF & REID, LLC; RON SROKA, P.A.; BENJAMIN ZAJDEL; STANLEY ALPERT, P.A.; HEIDI S. KENNY, P.A.; KAREN M. AUTHEMENT, P.A.; MARY F. KEENAN, Assistant Solicitor; KYRIAKOS MARUDAS, Assistant Solicitor; A.J. BILLIG AUCTIONEERS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:12-cv-02418-JKB)
Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Lee, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Reginald L. Lee appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman ∗ doctrine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. Mayor & City Council of Balt., No. 1:12-cv-02418-JKB (D. Md. filed Sept. 14, 2012; entered Sept. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.