Habeeb Malik v. James Sligh, Jr.
Habeeb Malik v. James Sligh, Jr.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7576
HABEEB ABDUL MALIK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES E. SLIGH, JR.; JANNITA GASTON; BERNARD MCKIE; JON E. OZMINT; BILL BYARS; VAUGHN JACKSON; ROBERT E. WARD; TRAVIS REESE, All sued in their individual and official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (5:11-cv-01064-RBH)
Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Habeeb Abdul Malik, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Habeeb Abdul Malik appeals the district court’s order
accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Malik v. Sligh, No. 5:11-cv-01064-RBH (D.S.C.
Sept. 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished