United States v. Kelsey Kinard

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Kelsey Kinard

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-4494

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KELSEY LENTRELL KINARD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:07-cr-00486-TLW-2)

Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelsey Lentrell Kinard, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Rose Mary Parham, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM

Kelsey Lentrell Kinard appeals the district court’s

amended judgment granting the Government’s Fed. R. Crim. P.

35(b) motion. To the extent that Kinard’s claim that the

district court failed to consider various factors in determining

the extent of the sentence reduction challenges the lawfulness

of the district court’s sentencing methodology, we have

jurisdiction over Kinard’s appeal. See United States v. Davis,

679 F.3d 190, 194

(4th Cir. 2012). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished