Earles Craddock v. Keith White
Earles Craddock v. Keith White
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2283
EARLES M. CRADDOCK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
KEITH WHITE, Attorney,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00074-IMK-JSK)
Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earles M. Craddock, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Earles M. Craddock appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing Craddock’s civil action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Craddock v. White, No.
1:12-cv-00074-IMK-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 10, 2012). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished