Earles Craddock v. Keith White

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Earles Craddock v. Keith White

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2283

EARLES M. CRADDOCK,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

KEITH WHITE, Attorney,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00074-IMK-JSK)

Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earles M. Craddock, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Earles M. Craddock appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing Craddock’s civil action. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Craddock v. White, No.

1:12-cv-00074-IMK-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 10, 2012). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished