Thomas Cox v. State of Maryland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Thomas Cox v. State of Maryland

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2134

THOMAS R. COX,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY; KELLY PULTZ,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George Levi Russell, III, District Judge. (1:12-cv-01364-GLR)

Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas R. Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Scott Curtis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip E. Culpepper, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland; Morgan William Fisher, LAWRENCE & FISHER PLLC, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thomas R. Cox appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint against

the State of Maryland and Anne Arundel County, and his

defamation complaint against Kelly Pultz. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Cox v. Maryland, No.

1:12-cv-01364-GLR (D. Md. Sept. 10, 2012). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished