Thomas Cox v. State of Maryland
Thomas Cox v. State of Maryland
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2134
THOMAS R. COX,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY; KELLY PULTZ,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George Levi Russell, III, District Judge. (1:12-cv-01364-GLR)
Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas R. Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Scott Curtis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip E. Culpepper, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland; Morgan William Fisher, LAWRENCE & FISHER PLLC, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Thomas R. Cox appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2006) complaint against
the State of Maryland and Anne Arundel County, and his
defamation complaint against Kelly Pultz. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Cox v. Maryland, No.
1:12-cv-01364-GLR (D. Md. Sept. 10, 2012). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished