Stephen Sieber v. Cheryl Rose

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Stephen Sieber v. Cheryl Rose

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2031

In re: STEPHEN C. SIEBER

Debtor

------------------------------

STEPHEN C. SIEBER,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

CHERYL E. ROSE,

Trustee – Appellee,

and

CHRISTOPHER PETITO; RONALD WILLIAMS,

Creditors.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:12- cv-00210-RWT)

Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen C. Sieber, Appellant Pro Se. James Martin Hoffman, OFFIT KURMAN, PA, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Stephen C. Sieber appeals from the district court’s

orders affirming the bankruptcy court’s order sustaining the

objections to Sieber’s amended claim of exemptions and denying

his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s orders and find no reversible error and no

abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Sieber v. Rose, No. 8:12-cv-

00210-RWT (D. Md. July 24, 2012 & Aug. 7, 2012). Sieber’s

motions to consolidate his two pending appeals and for the

recusal of the bankruptcy court judge are denied. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished