Albert Eichel v. MacDonald

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Albert Eichel v. MacDonald

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7997

ALBERT CHARLES EICHEL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MACDONALD, Ms.; Chapline; BENNETT, Ms.; Major,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-01220-TSE-TRJ)

Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 23, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Charles Eichel, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Albert Charles Eichel appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). On appeal, we confine our review to

the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R.

34(b). Because Eichel’s informal brief does not challenge the

basis for the district court’s disposition, Eichel has forfeited

appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we deny

Eichel’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm the district

court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished