UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7654

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DONZEL FREDRICKUS STINSON, a/k/a Shack, a/k/a Shaq,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:06-cr-00022-RLV-CH-20)

Submitted: January 10, 2013 Decided: January 23, 2013

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donzel Fredrickus Stinson, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donzel Fredrickus Stinson appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a reduction in his sentence under

(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Stinson, No. 5:06-cr-00022-RLV-CH-20 (Aug. 23, 2012). We deny

Stinson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2