Morris Pettigrew, Sr. v. Corizon Medical Services

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Morris Pettigrew, Sr. v. Corizon Medical Services

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8077

MORRIS J. PETTIGREW, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES; PAUL MATERA, MD; DAVID M. MATHIS, MD; LINO QUILO, MD; JOSEPH INZERILLO, MD; BRUCE FORD, PA; JESSICA CECIL, PA; JENNIFER PATTERSON, RN; DR. CLEM, Medical Director,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Party Below.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George Levi Russell, III, District Judge. (1:12-cv-01713-GLR)

Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 25, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Morris J. Pettigrew, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Davis, III, Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN & COURTNEY, PC, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Morris J. Pettigrew, Sr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order assessing a filing fee and denying his motion to

appoint counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2006), and certain interlocutory

and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541

, 545-

46 (1949). The order Pettigrew seeks to appeal is neither a

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished