Samuel Whitner v. Disciplinary Counsel
Samuel Whitner v. Disciplinary Counsel
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7784
SAMUEL LAMONT WHITNER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL LESLEY M. COGGIOLA; STAFF ATTORNEY TIFFANY N. RICHARDSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:12-cv-01876-CMC)
Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 25, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel Lamont Whitner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Samuel Lamont Whitner appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing Whitner’s civil action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Whitner v. Disciplinary
Counsel Lesley M. Coggiola, No. 3:12-cv-01876-CMC (D.S.C.
Sept. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished