U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Samuel Whitner v. Disciplinary Counsel

Samuel Whitner v. Disciplinary Counsel
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 25, 2013

Samuel Whitner v. Disciplinary Counsel

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7784

SAMUEL LAMONT WHITNER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL LESLEY M. COGGIOLA; STAFF ATTORNEY TIFFANY N. RICHARDSON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:12-cv-01876-CMC)

Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 25, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Lamont Whitner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Samuel Lamont Whitner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Whitner’s civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Whitner v. Disciplinary Counsel Lesley M. Coggiola, No. 3:12-cv-01876-CMC (D.S.C. Sept. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.