William Taccino v. Bank of America

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

William Taccino v. Bank of America

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2235

WILLIAM A. TACCINO,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, successor to LaSalle Bank National Assoc.; DANIEL J. TOBIN; BALLARD & SPAHR, LLC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:12-cv-02677-RDB)

Submitted: January 30, 2013 Decided: February 7, 2013

Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William A. Taccino, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William A. Taccino appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a claim. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Taccino v. Bank of America, No. 1:12-cv-02677-RDB (D.

Md. Sept. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished