United States v. Shawn Randle

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Shawn Randle

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7632

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

SHAWN DEWAYNE RANDLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:07-cr-00084-JCT-4)

Submitted: January 23, 2013 Decided: February 8, 2013

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shawn Dewayne Randle, Appellant Pro Se. Charlene Rene Day, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Shawn Dewayne Randle appeals the district court’s

order denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) motion for

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Randle, No. 7:07-cr-

00084-JCT-4 (W.D. Va. July 27, 2012). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished