U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Bernard Gadsden

United States v. Bernard Gadsden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 20, 2013

United States v. Bernard Gadsden

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6040

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BERNARD MARLIN GADSDEN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:04-cr-01018-DCN-1)

Submitted: February 13, 2013 Decided: February 20, 2013

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Marlin Gadsden, Appellant Pro Se. Alston Calhoun Badger, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Bernard Marlin Gadsden seeks to appeal the district court’s orders directing the Government to respond to Gadsden’s motion for reduction of sentence and granting the Government an extension. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545- (1949). The orders Gadsden seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.