U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Ernest Perry

United States v. Ernest Perry
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 22, 2013

United States v. Ernest Perry

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7602

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ERNEST PERRY, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:08-cr-00399-HEH-1)

Submitted: February 1, 2013 Decided: February 22, 2013

Before KING, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Perry, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Ernest Perry appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Perry, No. 3:08-cr- 00399-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.