Thomas Switzer v. Sergeant Dean

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Thomas Switzer v. Sergeant Dean

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2274

THOMAS L. SWITZER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SERGEANT DEAN, a/k/a Officer Dean,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

TOWN OF STANLEY; DOUG PURDHAM, Mayor; OFFICER BROWN; MARK BELTON, Page County Administrator; JOHN THOMAS, Sheriff; DEPUTY HAMMER; PAGE COUNTY JAIL,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00021-MFU-JGW)

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 25, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas L. Switzer, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Hustis Milnor, TAYLOR ZUNKER MILNOR & CARTER LTD, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Thomas L. Switzer appeals the district court’s orders

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint, and denying

various post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Switzer v. Dean, No.

5:11-cv-00021-MFU-JGW (W.D. Va. Aug. 10 & Oct. 12, 2012). We

deny Switzer’s motion for transcripts at Government expense. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished