U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Marcus Frierson v. Acc Warden Bell

Marcus Frierson v. Acc Warden Bell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 25, 2013

Marcus Frierson v. Acc Warden Bell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7745

MARCUS ANTONIO FRIERSON, a/k/a Antonio Marcus Frierson, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ACC WARDEN W. BELL; SGT. MALCOM X. WILLIAMS; R. HILTON, SMU; B. OBVERMEN, SMU; LT. E. MIMS, SMU; JOHN OZMINT, Defendants – Appellees, and CAPT HUGHES; SGT. G. TONEY; OFC RICHARD MCCONICO; OFC PARKER, BM SMU; SGT G. PERASON; LT CEDRIC JUNE, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00094-MGL)

Submitted: January 31, 2013 Decided: February 25, 2013

Before DAVIS, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus Antonio Frierson, Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Marcus Antonio Frierson appeals the district court’s judgment entered for the Defendants following a jury trial on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.