Kate Uwasomba v. Clyde Jett

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Kate Uwasomba v. Clyde Jett

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2253

KATE I. UWASOMBA,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

and

JUDITH UWASOMBA; SARAH UWASOMBA,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CLYDE D. JETT, in individual and official capacity; CENTRAL TRANSPORT INCORPORATED; DOUGLAS A. LINES, PC, attorney; DONALDSON & BLACK INCORPORATION; ARONBERG GOLDGEHN & GARMISA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:12-cv-00213-HEH)

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 25, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kate I. Uwasomba, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia Lee Santoni, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER, LLP, McLean, Virginia; Ronald Paul Herbert, HERBERT & SATTERWHITE PC, Richmond, Virginia; Annemarie DiNardo Cleary, Douglas P. Rucker, Jr., SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Kate I. Uwasomba appeals the district court’s order

denying reconsideration of its order denying her Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for relief from its order

dismissing her civil complaint for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Uwasomba leave to

proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s order.

Uwasomba v. Jett, 3:12-cv-00213-HEW (E.D. Va. Sept. 21, 2012).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished