Jamal Azeez v. Kristen Keller

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Jamal Azeez v. Kristen Keller

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2129

JAMAL A. AZEEZ,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

KRISTEN L. KELLER, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney; LAWRENCE R. FRAIL, Chief Prosecuting Attorney; BRUCE LAZENBY, Former Prosecuting Attorney; CEDRIC ROBERTSON, Police Officer; DAVID H. COOK, Police Officer; JOHN HUTCHINSON, County Judge; JANICE DAVIS, Clerk of Court,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

FRANCIS M. CURNUTTE, III, Attorney at Law; BILLY COLE, Chief of Police,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:06-cv-00106)

Submitted: January 24, 2013 Decided: February 25, 2013

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamal A. Azeez, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin John Robinson, Chip E. Williams, PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC, Beckley, West Virginia; Francis M. Curnutte, III, FARMER, CLINE & CAMPBELL, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Jamal A. Azeez appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. §§ 1983

, 1985 (2006) complaint

and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the

record and Azeez’s claims and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Azeez v. Keller, No. 5:06-cv-00106 (S.D. W. Va. Aug. 6 &

31, 2012). We deny Azeez’s motion to stay the appeal and

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished