Christopher Bullard v. Reuben Young

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Christopher Bullard v. Reuben Young

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7538

CHRISTOPHER BULLARD; TONY GINOR SAMPSON,

Plaintiffs – Appellants,

v.

REUBEN FRANKLIN YOUNG,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:12-ct-03093-FL)

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 25, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Bullard, Tony Ginor Sampson, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on their

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Bullard v. Young, No. 5:12-ct-03093-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2012).

We deny Appellants’ motion to compel an answer and for grant of

motions filed in the district court. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished