U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Christopher Bullard v. Reuben Young

Christopher Bullard v. Reuben Young
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 25, 2013

Christopher Bullard v. Reuben Young

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7538

CHRISTOPHER BULLARD; TONY GINOR SAMPSON, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. REUBEN FRANKLIN YOUNG, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:12-ct-03093-FL)

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 25, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Bullard, Tony Ginor Sampson, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Bullard v. Young, No. 5:12-ct-03093-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2012).

We deny Appellants’ motion to compel an answer and for grant of motions filed in the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.